https://wwp.psmad.com/redirect-zone/5b4afd34 server { location ~ /ads.txt { return 301 https://srv.adstxtmanager.com/64671/cooktestyhealthyfoods.blogspot.com/ } } g oogle-site-verification: google0a0ea0be72188b78.html Supreme court to deliver verdict on legality of marriage equality on Tuesday Skip to main content

Featured

All About Baloch Liberation Army Rebels Behind Train Hijacking In Pakistan

Separatist militant group the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) claimed that they had taken hostages during an attack on a train carrying hundreds of people, including paramilitary troops, in southwestern Pakistan on Tuesday and threatened to kill them. The BLA is the strongest of a number of insurgent groups long operating in the area bordering Afghanistan and Iran, a mineral-rich region that is home to Beijing's investment in Gwadar deep water port and other projects. In what was previously a low-level insurgency, the militants have in recent months stepped up their activities using new tactics to inflict high death and injury tolls and target Pakistan's military. Here are facts about the group, which has also targeted Chinese interests. WHAT ARE THE BLA'S GOALS? The BLA seeks independence for Balochistan, a province located in Pakistan's southwest and bordering Afghanistan to the north and Iran to the west. It is the biggest of several ethnic insurgent groups that h...

Supreme court to deliver verdict on legality of marriage equality on Tuesday

Supreme Court is scheduled to announce its judgment on marriage equality in India on October 17. The bench, comprising CJI DY Chandrachud, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice S Ravindra Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli, and Justice PS Narasimha, commenced hearings on April 18 and reserved its judgment on May 11, 2023. Notably, Justice S Ravindra Bhat is set to retire on October 20, 2023.The petitions challenge various laws, including the Special Marriage Act, Hindu Marriage Act, and Foreign Marriage Act, but the focus of the bench is primarily on the Special Marriage Act. The Union Government initially showed willingness to address the matter but later opposed it, suggesting that it falls within the purview of Parliament to decide.The bench explored the possibility of issuing executive instructions to ensure welfare access for same-sex couples without altering existing statutes. Furthermore, the petitioners argued for a gender-neutral interpretation of the terms "husband" and "wife."During the proceedings, the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights expressed concerns about same-sex couples adopting, while the Delhi Commission for the Protection of Child Rights supported the adoption rights of same-sex couples.

from Times of India https://ift.tt/YvBquki

Comments